0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°íµîÇлýÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁø »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä°ú °ü·Ã ¿äÀÎ

The Determinants of a Health Promoting Lifestyle in High school students

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 10±Ç 2È£ p.330 ~ 346
KMID : 0607719990100020330
È«¿ÜÇö ( Hong Woi-Hyun ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ °£È£°úÇבּ¸¼Ò

±èÁ¤³² ( Kim Jung-Nam ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

This descriptive correlational study was conducted to identify the variables related to a health promoting lifestyle in high school students. 304 high school students and 189 vocational high school students living in Taegu city were selected by a convenience sampling method. The data were collected by self-reported questionnaires from August 24 to September 4, 1998. Pender and others¡¯¡¯ Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile, Shere et al¡¯¡¯s. Self-Efficacy scale, Wallston et al.¡¯¡¯s Internal Health Locus of Control scale, Wares¡¯¡¯ Health self rating scale and Cohen & Hoberman¡¯¡¯s Social support scale were used. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test, MANOVA, ANOVA. Tukey verification and Stepwise multiple regression with an SAS program. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The average score of a health promoting lifestyle performance was 2.38(SD=.36) of a 4 point scale .Self-actualization (mean = 2.80. SD = .60). interpersonal support(mean = 2.73, SD=.47), health responsibility (mean=1.53, SD=.47), nutrition(mean=2.64, SD=.63), exercise(mean=2.71. SD=.72) and stress management(mean=2.37, SD=.58) were also analyzed. 2. The combination of self-efficacy, social-support, internal health locus of control. father¡¯¡¯s educational level and perceived health status explained 37.97% of the variance in health promoting lifestyles. 3. A Health promoting lifestyle showed significant positive correlations with self efficacy(r=.5173. p=.0011), perceived health status(r=.254, p=.001) and internal health locus of control(r=.321. p=.001). 4. According to sex(t=7.38. p=.006). economic state(F=6.62, p=.00l), Father¡¯¡¯s educational level(F=4.25, p=.005), mother¡¯¡¯s educational level(F=6.94. p=.000l), the grade of educational performance(F=3.74, p=.024), sleeping hours(F=3.47. p=.032) and social support(F=40.76, p=.0001). there were significant differences and modifying factors in health promoting lifestyles. On the basis of the above findings. self-efficacy in cognitive factors, and social support in modifying factors were identified as the variables which explained most of Pender¡¯¡¯s health-promotion model. Nursing strategies enhancing self-efficacy and social support which have a more significant effect on health promoting lifestyles should be developed. Further research is required to find out the factors influencing health pormoting lifestyle of high school students.
KeyWords
°Ç°­ÁõÁø »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä, °íµîÇлý
ealth promoting lifestyle, High school students
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed